
hackrf_stop_rx() is handled in hackrf_close(), so there seems to be no need to call it separately. Furthermore, if hackrf_stop() is called separately, it causes hackrf_close() to take more than half a second longer.
hackrf_stop_rx() is handled in hackrf_close(), so there seems to be no need to call it separately. Furthermore, if hackrf_stop() is called separately, it causes hackrf_close() to take more than half a second longer.