Deal with the bigger flash we have on rad1o
This commit is contained in:
@ -85,11 +85,10 @@ void w25q80bv_setup(void)
|
||||
SSP_MASTER,
|
||||
SSP_SLAVE_OUT_ENABLE);
|
||||
|
||||
device_id = 0;
|
||||
while(device_id != W25Q80BV_DEVICE_ID_RES)
|
||||
{
|
||||
do {
|
||||
device_id = w25q80bv_get_device_id();
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while(device_id != W25Q80BV_DEVICE_ID_RES &&
|
||||
device_id != W25Q16DV_DEVICE_ID_RES);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
uint8_t w25q80bv_get_status(void)
|
||||
@ -163,11 +162,10 @@ void w25q80bv_chip_erase(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint8_t device_id;
|
||||
|
||||
device_id = 0;
|
||||
while(device_id != W25Q80BV_DEVICE_ID_RES)
|
||||
{
|
||||
do {
|
||||
device_id = w25q80bv_get_device_id();
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while(device_id != W25Q80BV_DEVICE_ID_RES &&
|
||||
device_id != W25Q16DV_DEVICE_ID_RES);
|
||||
|
||||
w25q80bv_write_enable();
|
||||
w25q80bv_wait_while_busy();
|
||||
@ -208,11 +206,10 @@ void w25q80bv_program(uint32_t addr, uint32_t len, const uint8_t* data)
|
||||
uint16_t first_block_len;
|
||||
uint8_t device_id;
|
||||
|
||||
device_id = 0;
|
||||
while(device_id != W25Q80BV_DEVICE_ID_RES)
|
||||
{
|
||||
do {
|
||||
device_id = w25q80bv_get_device_id();
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while(device_id != W25Q80BV_DEVICE_ID_RES &&
|
||||
device_id != W25Q16DV_DEVICE_ID_RES);
|
||||
|
||||
/* do nothing if we would overflow the flash */
|
||||
if ((len > W25Q80BV_NUM_BYTES) || (addr > W25Q80BV_NUM_BYTES)
|
||||
|
@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#define W25Q80BV_DEVICE_ID_RES 0x13 /* Expected device_id for W25Q80BV */
|
||||
#define W25Q16DV_DEVICE_ID_RES 0x14 /* Expected device_id for W25Q16DV */
|
||||
|
||||
typedef union
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user